Legal Opinion
Lovitt v. Robideaux
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 2003No. 28191PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIDWELL, Justice.
The Lovitts appeal, and the Robideauxs cross appeal, from the district court’s conclusion that it could not determine the littoral rights of either party and that the Robi-deauxs may not limit the nature and scope of a prescriptive easement by means of a locked gate. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Robert and Judy Lovitt (Lovitts) own Lot 111 of the Hayden Lake Cottage Tracts on Hayden Lake, Kootenai County, Idaho. Robert and Karen Robideaux (Robideaux) own Lots 112, 113, and 114 of the Hayden Lake Cottage Tracts. Lots 111 and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- West v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Abbott v. Nampa School District No. 131Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Bolger v. LanceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Gibbens v. WeisshauptIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Williamson v. City of McCallIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Beckstead v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Sweezey v. NeelSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- McFarland v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Berglund v. DixIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
- Mcfarland v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.