Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ledesma v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 26, 1984No. 682-83, 683-83Published

1DissentClinton, Judge

In my judgment, the “agreed case” problem is knottier than any contemporaneous opinion has thus far indicated, and it needs to be addressed.

Article Y, Sec. 25 is an obscure provision in our Texas Constitution that is often overlooked. It grants to the Supreme Court “power to make and establish rules of procedure not inconsistent with the laws of this State for the government of said court and the other courts of this State ...” Equally little regarded is an opinion of the Court respecting that provision: Sessions v. State, 81 Tex.Cr.R. 424, 197 S.W. 718 (1917). It has not been overruled,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Sessions v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Ratcliff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API