Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1988)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided September 20, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Auditor and Inspector Scott

¶ 0 The Attorney General has received your request for an official opinion asking, in effect:

Must a public service company which is protesting the valuationof its property before the State Board of Equalization, pay itsad valorem taxes to the counties under protest in order to obtaina refund, where the taxes are due prior to a decision by theState Board of Equalization?

¶ 1 The property of public service corporations is assessed annually by the State Board of Equalization. 68 O.S. 2443 (1981). Public service corporations prepare lists of their taxable property…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Midwest City v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. Martin v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Taber v. Carter Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API