Legal Opinion

Smith v. Dickinson

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division

Decided April 16, 1953No. 186780Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BARTLETT, J.

1. MOTION FOR REHEARING AND REQUEST FOR QRAL ARGUMENT THEREON, BOTH OVERRULED.

*5The motion for a rehearing on the court’s order dismissing the appeal from the Municipal Court of Columbus, has been referred back to the undersigned as the judge who rendered he-order of dismissal.

“The office of an application for rehearing is not to invoke again an expression from the Court upon matters which have been already carefully and completely considered, but to direct the attention of the Court to some questions or propositions of law or facts that have,not been given attention.”

White…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. State v. FishwickOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. White v. ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Golden v. FogoOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Foerster v. FoersterOhio Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API