Legal Opinion

Horne v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge McCloskey.

This case involves the cross-petitions for review of Michael Horne (Claimant) and Chalmers & Kubeck (Employer) from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), affirming the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ), granting Claimant’s claim petition. 1 We now affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

Employer employed Claimant as an industrial mechanic beginning on November 30, 1998. Claimant’s job duties included overhauling valves of all. different sizes both on-site at Employer’s facility and off-site at facilities which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Innovative Spaces v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Bond v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bufford v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Ostrawski v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API