Hill v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
ONION, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of murder who assessed his punishment at 40 years in the Department of Corrections.
On appeal appellant contended, inter alia, that the trial court erred in failing to suppress E_Y_’s in-eourt identification of him because the State did not show her identification came from a source independent of and not tainted by a photographic display and an illegal lineup. Appellant further urged the trial court erred in permitting E_Y_to testify, over objection, that she had also identified…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Crosby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Whalon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Villalobos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1999
- Nelson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993
- Morgan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.