Kinsey v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Goudge, Williams, Chandler & Hughes, and Goudge, Robinson & Hughes, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
On May 12, 1911, defendant issued to Edward W. Kinsey, who was the husband of plaintiff, a policy of insurance by which defendant agreed to and did insure said Kinsey against "bodily injury sustained during the term of the policy through accidental means (excluding suicide, sane or insane, or any attempt thereat, sane or insane) and resulting directly, independently and exclusively of all other causes in . . . death." Plaintiff, as beneficiary named in said policy, alleging the insured, while bathing in the surf, was accidentally drowned, on September 18, 1913, brought this action to recover…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Taylor v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1906
- Weber v. Ancient Order of PyramidsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. McAlpinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Mary C. Weber v. Continental Casualty Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Criss v. Angelus Hospital Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Trueblood v. Maryland Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.