Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Imparato

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 25, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

S. Samuel Di Falco, S.

Sufficient facts showing the physical condition having been presented, this motion by the surviving spouse to perpetuate his testimony is granted. That he may be incompetent to testify at the trial by virtue of the provisions of section 347 of the Civil Practice Act is not a valid objection to granting his examination (Lemlich v. Lemlich, 266 App. Div. 748; Matter of Tow, 93 N. Y. S. 2d 899; Matter of Lowenstein, 138 N. Y. S. 2d 420; Matter of Dobrotescu, N. Y. L. J., May 17, 1950, p. 1755, col. 3). The examination will be conducted before a law assistant of this court…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of KellyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API