Legal Opinion
Couser v. Comenity Bank
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 27, 2015No. Case No. 12cv2484-MMA-BGSPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1038ORDER:
AFFIRMING IN PART TENTATIVE RULING
[Doc. No. 85]
GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
[Doc. No. 82]
GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE INCENTIVE PAYMENT
[Doc. No. 63]
MICHAEL M. ANELLO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Carrie Couser, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, moves for Final Approval of Class Settlement and for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Incentive Award. See Doc. Nos. 63, 82. The Court held a final approval hearing on the matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Pia McAdams v. Nationstar MortgageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Spann v. J.C. Penney Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Spann v. J.C. Penney Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Hashw v. Department Stores National BankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Nunez v. Bae Sys. San Diego Ship Repair Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.