Legal Opinion

Richie and Griffith v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 24, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Rees

Reversing.

The appellants, Rollie Ritchie and Joe Griffith, were separately indicted, charged with the crime of robbery. By agreement they were tried together and each was convicted and sentenced to the penitentiary for a period of two years.

A number of grounds are relied upon for reversal, but it is only necessary to discuss one, namely, that the Johnson circuit court was not legally in session when the indictment against Joe Griffith was returned and when the trial took place.

The appellant Ritchie was indicted on December 2, 1927, which was during the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Tackett v. TackettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  3. Sanford v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. Farmers' National Bank v. Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Daniel v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  2. Singleton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  3. Cox v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  4. Hardy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
  5. Buchler v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API