Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Lehigh Portland Cement Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 21, 1953No. 6574_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOPER, Circuit Judge.
The question in this case is whether the Lehigh Portland Cement Company was required by §§ 8(a) (1) and 8(a) (5) of the National Labor Relations Act as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., to bargain with the United Cement, Lime and Gypsum Workers International Union, the bargaining representative of 254 out of a total of 288 of its employees, in respect to the rental of 65 dwelling units owned and maintained by the company in the vicinity of the plant. The Labor Board held that the housing units were a mandatory subject of the bargaining provision of the Act, 101 N.L.R.B.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hart Cotton Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
3Cited by21 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Brockway Motor Trucks, Division of Mack Trucks, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Local 777, Democratic Union Organizing Committee, Seafarers International Union of North America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Yellow Cab Company and Checker Taxi Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Local 777, Democratic Union, Etc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Local 777, Democratic Union Organizing Committee v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Seattle First National Bank v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.