Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 1973No. 9523PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TITUS, Chief Judge.

A jury found defendant guilty of forcible rape (§ 559.260 RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S.) but could not agree upon the punishment. Subsequent to post-trial proceedings, the court assessed a sentence of 12 years. Rule 27.03, V.A.M.R. Defendant appeals.

The 20-year old prosecuting witness (we shall call her “X”) was sleeping on a living room sofa in her parents’ Bolivar home at 7 o’clock on a Sunday morning in September 1971. Two small children were ostensibly asleep in a nearby bedroom; the parents were absent from the residence. X awakened and saw a man, whom she identified as the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. State v. AubuchonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. State v. CrowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  4. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  5. State v. ArringtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. McClainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. State v. WadeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Cole v. ColeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. State v. BebeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. State v. DrakeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API