Legal Opinion

Brent G. Theobald Construction, Inc. v. Richardson Construction, Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 2006No. 43155PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Becker, J.:

In this case, we confirm that a lawsuit dismissed under NRCP 41(e), unless dismissed without prejudice, is res judicata to a future lawsuit between the same plaintiff and defendant involving the same claims for relief. Appellant Brent G. Theobald Construction, Inc., filed a lawsuit, which the district court dismissed based on NRCP 41(e) for failure to prosecute. The district court did not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice. Without appealing the dismissal, Theobald filed a second lawsuit, which the district court dismissed as res judicata.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Consolidated Generator-Nevada, Inc. v. Cummins Engine Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mallin v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Home Savings Ass'n v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Stockmeier v. Nevada Department of Corrections Psychological Review PanelNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Hampe v. FooteNevada Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of North Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Five Star Capital Corp. v. RubyNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. HUNTER VS. GANG C/W 59691Nevada Supreme Court · 2016
  4. HUNTER VS. GANG C/W 59691Nevada Supreme Court · 2016
  5. HUNTER VS. GANG C/W 63804Nevada Supreme Court · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API