Legal Opinion
Guishard v. General Security Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
Decided September 11, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiffs seek a judgment declaring that defendant General Security Insurance Company is obligated under the terms of a commercial general liability policy to defend and indemnify them in a pending personal injury action. In the underlying lawsuit, the plaintiff alleges that he severely injured his eye while riveting metal to a van for the purpose of converting it into a “Mr. Softee” ice cream truck. Plaintiffs owned the van.
*902The policy excludes coverage for bodily injury “arising out of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Farmers Fire Insurance v. KingsburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Pennsylvania Millers Mutual Insurance v. MancoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Associated Dermatology & Skin Cancer Clinic of Helena, P.C. v. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2017
- Creinis v. Hanover InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Main Street America Assurance Company v. Northeast Property MaintenanceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025
- Valley Forge Ins. Co. v. ACE Am. Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018