Legal Opinion

Fickbohm v. Schoonover

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1970No. 8910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

This is an action for damages for fraud and deceit based upon alleged misrepresentations made to plaintiff by the defendants in connection with the sale of a tract of land. In his petition, plaintiff alleged that defendants falsely and fraudulently represented to him that the tract in question consisted of five acres, when in fact it contained only two and one-half, and that the defendants represented that the water supply was sufficient for household needs and for the purpose of “watering one head of stock,” when in fact the water supply was insufficient for either purpose. At…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Judd v. WalkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Bourne Ex Rel. Bourne v. ManleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. McGhee v. BellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  4. Yerington v. RissSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  5. Judd v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Best v. CulhaneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. In Re L____Supreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  3. Brown v. MickelsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Childs v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State v. KnuppSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API