Legal Opinion

Carr v. Forbes, Inc.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided November 9, 2000No. 6:99-1967-13PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment AND Denying Plaintiffs Motion to Seal Order Pending Appeal

GEORGE ROSS ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This matter came before this Court for hearing on Thursday, September 28, 2000, on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and on Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Defendants were represented at the hearing by Wallace K. Lightsey and Carl F. Muller of the law firm Wyche, Burgess, Freeman & Parham, P.A., and by Tennyson Schad, of the law firm Norwiek & Schad. Plaintiff was represented at the hearing by William M.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. New York Times Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lluberes v. UNCOMMON PRODUCTIONS, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  2. Scott v. City of Sioux CityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API