Legal Opinion

Pacific Power & Light Co. v. Bailey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1931No. 22345. En BancPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Prior to 1913, the plaintiff, Pacific Power & Light Company, or its predecessor in interest by deeds of conveyance which were duly recorded, became the owner in fee simple of a strip of land 75 feet wide part of the way and 100 feet wide the balance of the way across the NW1A of the NW 1 ^ and the NE^A of the NW^A, Sec. 13, Tp. 14, N. R. 17 E. W. M., situate in Yakima county. Prior to 1913, the plaintiff constructed, and has at all times since operated and maintained, a water canal on the strip of land.

In 1913, defendants Bailey purchased and took a deed of conveyance from P. F. Sprengle and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bowers v. LedgerwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. McAuliff v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. King v. BassindaleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Metropolitan Building Co. v. FitzgeraldWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Wissinger v. ReedWashington Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gusheroski v. LewisArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Roesch v. GerstWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. De Forrest v. BunnieNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Turner v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Mittet v. HansenWashington Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API