Legal Opinion

Harmon v. San Francisco & San Rafael Railroad

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1890No. 12,017PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from Superior Court, Marin County; E. B. Mahon, Judge. On rehearing. For former report, see ante, p. 144, 22 Pac. 407.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

This cause was heard in department 1, and the judgment and order were affirmed October 4, 1889, on the authority of Gordon Hardware Co. v. Railroad Co., ante, p. 140, 22 Pac. 406 (filed on that day). By consent of counsel for the respective parties the court below, before the trial of either cause, made an order that the two actions be consolidated. When the cases were considered by this court it was assumed that the record in this ease was substantially the same as the record in No. 12,030; but our attention was called to the fact in the petition for a hearing before the court in bank, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Malone v. Big Flat Gravel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Putnam v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Gordon Hardware Co. v. San Francisco & San Rafael RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. C. B. Carter Lumber Co. v. Simpson & HuffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API