In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against O'Neil
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶ 1. We review the recommendation of the referee, Konrad T. Tuchscherer, that Attor ney James Paul O'Neil receive a public reprimand for professional misconduct consisting of revealing information relating to his representation of a client without the client's consent, and that he be required to pay the costs of the proceeding.
¶ 2. We determine that a public reprimand is appropriate discipline for Attorney O'Neil's misconduct. We also order him to pay the costs of this proceeding.
¶ 3. Attorney O'Neil was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1988 and practices in Green Bay. On November 21,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against O'NeilWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MeeksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Peter J. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against KonnorWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against KonnorWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against KonnorWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.