Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against O'Neil

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 2003No. 02-1029-DPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review the recommendation of the referee, Konrad T. Tuchscherer, that Attor ney James Paul O'Neil receive a public reprimand for professional misconduct consisting of revealing information relating to his representation of a client without the client's consent, and that he be required to pay the costs of the proceeding.

¶ 2. We determine that a public reprimand is appropriate discipline for Attorney O'Neil's misconduct. We also order him to pay the costs of this proceeding.

¶ 3. Attorney O'Neil was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1988 and practices in Green Bay. On November 21,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against O'NeilWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. MeeksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Peter J. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Disciplinary Proceedings Against KonnorWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Disciplinary Proceedings Against KonnorWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Disciplinary Proceedings Against KonnorWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API