Legal Opinion

Smith v. Singletary

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 1, 1995No. 94-2772PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In this capital case, the sentencing court violated Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 107 S.Ct. 1821, 95 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987). This appeal requires us to determine whether this error was harmless under the standard articulated in Brecht v. Abrahamson, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 1710, 123 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993). We affirm the district court’s determination that the error was not harmless under the Brecht standard.

FACTS

On December 12, 1978, appellee, Frank Elijah Smith, and two accomplices, Johnny Copeland and Victor Hall, robbed a convenience store in Wakulla County, Florida. They also abducted the store…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Skipper v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mason v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Ferguson Ex Rel. Ferguson v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Daniel TroyaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Chateloin v. SingletaryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Theodore WILLIAMS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, RespondentAppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API