Legal Opinion

In Re Crosby

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California

Decided November 1, 1993No. Bankruptcy 92-38042 AGPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

ARTHUR M. GREENWALD, Bankruptcy Judge.

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS

The Debtor, Cathy Lee Crosby (Ms. Crosby), filed a Chapter 7 Petition on July 20, 1993. Shortly thereafter, she filed certain schedules and statements as required by Rule 1007(b), Fed.R.Bankr.P., including schedules listing her personal property (Schedule B) and property claimed as exempt (Schedule C). These schedules were amended on two occasions.

The first meeting of creditors was held on August 26, 1992 and was continued to December 17, 1992 by agreement.

The Trustee filed objections to the following exemptions…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. In Re Alan David Lichstrahl, Debtor. Alan David Lichstrahl v. Bankers TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. In Re Irwin Hyman Janice Hyman, Debtors. Irwin Hyman Janice Hyman v. Gary A. Plotkin, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. William H. Nolan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Richard B. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re PhillipsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1997
  2. In Re KuraishiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API