Legal Opinion

Augustus v. Roemer

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided July 16, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-4667, 91-1441 to 91-1443PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

MENTZ, District Judge.

This matter came before the Court on the plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary and permanent injunction. By stipulation the parties requested that the Court advance the trial on the merits and consolidate that trial with the hearing on the preliminary injunction. Also, by agreement the parties stipulated that this matter would be bifurcated insofar as the facial constitutional challenge would be heard and decided first, to be followed if necessary by a trial on the constitutionality of the challenged statutes as applied.

Accordingly, this matter was tried…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BrumfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  2. Broussard v. Parish of OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  3. Pyka v. Village of Orland ParkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  4. Simpson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  5. Broussard v. Orleans ParishCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API