Legal Opinion
Sprankle v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 1, 1995No. 95-02551PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
662 So.2d 736 (1995)
Albert C. SPRANKLE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-02551.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
November 1, 1995.
2Per curiam
Albert C. Sprankle appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence. Of the two grounds stated, only his allegation that the court improperly included points on the guidelines scoresheet in violation of Karchesky v. State, 591 So.2d 930 (Fla. 1992), appears to have merit. We, therefore, affirm in part, but reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Sprankle asserted that in calculating…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Karchesky v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Sellers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- State v. SellersSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Burrows v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Fulkroad v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by17 opinions
- Eblin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Romero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Terrell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.