Fish v. Chase
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county by the receiver of the T. M. Roberts Co-operative Supply Company to recover the par value of certain stock. From orders, Hale, J., overruling defendants’ separate demurrers to the complaint, they appealed separately.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Action by the plaintiff, as receiver of the T. M. Roberts Co-operative Supply Company, to recover the amount of an assessment on the stock of defendant Charles L. Chase, and also to recover the amount of the par value of the stock, which it is alleged had never been paid. Defendant Charles L. Chase demurred to the complaint, upon the ground that several causes of action were united improperly, and upon the ground that the facts stated do not constitute a cause of action.
The complaint states the following facts as the first cause of action: About March 9, 1906, Mr. Chase became the owner of…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Boyd v. BruceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925