Gulledge v. Slayden-Kirksey Woolen Mills
Mississippi Supreme Court
FROM the circuit court of Holmes county. Hon. W. F. Stevens, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. We invite the court to pass upon the property statement, and to determine whether an unanswered query, even followed by a general statement, amounts to a conclusive answer in the way most favorable to the creditor.
Read the full summary
FROM the circuit court of Holmes county. Hon. W. F. Stevens, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. We invite the court to pass upon the property statement, and to determine whether an unanswered query, even followed by a general statement, amounts to a conclusive answer in the way most favorable to the creditor. We ask especially that the court shall pass upon the deed of trust, and decide whether or not, on its face, the beneficiaries, or any of them, are purchasers for value. The court below held, as a matter of fact, that they were not, independently of the question of bona fides.…
1Opinion of the CourtTeeRal, J.
On the eighth day of August, 1896, the Slayden-Kirksey Woolen Mills, an incorporated company of Waco, Texas, sued, out a replevin writ against A. F. Kyger, trustee, and W. A. and J. R. Gulledge, a mercantile company doing business at Durant, Miss., under the firm name of Gulledge Bros., for 69 pairs of jeans pants, of the value of $1 per pair; 9 pairs jeans pants, of the value of $1.25 per pair; 1 pair, at $2.50 per pair;, and 1 pair, at $2.25 per pair, which writ was levied the same day upon 1 pair cassimere pants, value $2.50; 1 pair gray pants, value $2.25; 9 pairs cassimere pants, at…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Surget v. BoydMississippi Supreme Court · 1879