Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hood v. McElroy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 30, 2011No. 1091075Published

1DissentMain, Justice

As the main opinion correctly discusses, this Court has held that the applicable standard of review is whether the trial *338court exceeded its considerable discretion. Indeed, in Holly v. Huntsville Hospital, 925 So.2d 160, 162-63 (Ala.2005), this Court stated:

“ ‘While we agree ... that a juror’s silence during voir dire could be a basis for granting a new trial, we must stress that the initial decision on this issue is within the trial court’s sound discretion. Hayes v. Boykin, 271 Ala. 588, 126 So.2d 91 (1960). Further, the trial court’s decision on this matter will not be disturbed on appeal…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Carter v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Allstate Ins. Co. v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Freeman v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Ex Parte DobyneSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Leach v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API