Legal Opinion

Hirsch v. Hirsch

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 8, 1962No. 21480PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Almand; Justice.

The judgment under review is one overruling a general demurrer to' an amended petition seeking a divorce on the ground of cruel treatment.

The main question is whether the allegations of the amended complaint charging the defendant wife with nagging are sufficient to> charge her with the wilful infliction of pain, bodily or mental, such as reasonably justifies the husband to apprehend damages to his life or health under Code § 30-102 (10).

The allegations of cruel treatment are as follows: “That this cruel treatment of the plaintiff by the defendant consisted in her continuously…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alford v. AlfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Wilkinson v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Head v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  4. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Cramer v. CramerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Swindle v. SwindleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  2. Hardy v. HardySupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  3. Botero v. BoteroSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API