Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hart v. Grays Harbor County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1939No. 27226. En BancPublished

1DissentBlake, J.

(dissenting) — I dissent. Appellant contends, and the majority holds, that a pension is a gratuity and not a right; that it inures to the pensioner personally and not to his estate. In support of this position, appellant cites Whitaker v. Clausen, 57 Wash. 268, 106 Pac. 745, 107 Pac. 832, and In re Snyder’s Petition, 93 Wash. 59, 160 Pac. 12, 3 A. L. R. 1230. While in the latter case it is asserted that a mother’s pension is “in the nature of a largess or bounty,” I think the decision has no bearing upon the problem presented here. For in that case, it is simply held that a mother who…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. State ex rel. Hart v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Kavanagh v. Board of Police Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Conant v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. In re SnyderWashington Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API