Clements v. State

The following statement of facts contained in brief of counsel for appellant seems to be properly stated and i£ borne out by the record, to wit:

“The .defendant was tried and convicted on a charge of having liquor in his possession. The testimony of the state tended to show that certain of the -state’s witnesses stopped the defendant in the road, searched his car, and found in his car a quart of whisky. The testimony of the state was to the effect that the officer making the search had a search warrant, which is set out on page 19 of the transcript. The testimony of the defendant tended to…