Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Steve R. Reich, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 12, 2004No. 38,424-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
|, STEWART, J.
At issue in this appeal is the validity of a default judgment. Because the default judgment in this case was not properly confirmed, the judgment is vacated and *850the case is remanded for further proceedings.
FACTS
The procedural issues presented by this appeal arise from a January 2003 lawsuit in which the plaintiff, David Andrew Hicks, claimed a privilege under the Private Works Act, as well as breach of contract, in connection with construction of a house in West Monroe, Louisiana. Plaintiff entered a preliminary default against defendants, Steve R. Reich, Inc., and Steve R.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hazelwood Farm, Inc. v. Liberty Oil & Gas Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Russell v. Illinois Cent. Gulf R. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Deville v. Orleans Oil Co. of LafayetteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
3Cited by9 opinions
- Citadel Builders, L.L.C. v. Dirt Worx of Louisiana, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Palowsky v. CampbellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Cole v. ColeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Jackson v. CulottaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- State v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.