Ortiz v. A.N.P., Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Third-Party Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 18). After considering the parties’ filings and the applicable law, the Court finds that the Motion for Summary Judgment should be granted in part and denied in part.
I.FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This case arises out of a workplace injury sustained by Plaintiff Aicia Ortiz (“Ortiz”) while working for her employer A.N.P., Inc. (“A.N.P.”). The following are undisputed facts proffered by Union Central.
Union Central issued a group insurance policy (the “Policy”), in which…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Home Builders Ass'n of Mississippi, Inc. v. City of MadisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.