Legal Opinion

Pollak Bros. v. Leo-Tex Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 11, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVET, District Judge.

This is a motion to'quash the return of a third-party summons and third-party complaint upon the ground that the third-party defendant, U. S. Finishing Company, was and is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey and having its principal office in New York and that the person served was not and is not an officer, director, stockholder, managing or general agent or employee, or otherwise authorized to receive service in its behalf.

These papers were served by a United States Deputy Marshal on Louis Joffe, an attorney, at 1740 Broadway,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. Furness (Pacific) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Farley v. SpragueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. L. Gilbert Cohen v. Newsweek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  3. Maine Drilling & Blasting, Inc. v. Lorusso Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API