Legal Opinion

Rovner v. Firemen's Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLouis B. Heller, J.

Defendant moves for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice and the dismissal of the complaint.

Plaintiff in this action seeks to recover from the defendant insurer, under a policy of insurance, alleged damages for the destruction of his personal property. It appears that “ the fire did not occur in plaintiff’s premises. He merely sustained water damage because of a fire in the premises of one of the other tenants in the building ” (opposing affidavit, p. 8).

The undisputed facts are as follows: Defendant issued a five-year policy of insurance commencing with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Truglio v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Mapu v. Agricultural InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Holz v. M. L. Nathanson & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lansing v. KremmelbeinNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API