Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Railroad Commission

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 26, 1937No. 8539PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAIR, Justice.

This is the second appeal of the Brow* Case; a rule 37 case. The first appeal was from an interlocutory order denying a temporary injunction to restrain the drilling and operation of an oil well on a l%-acre tract’of land in the East Texas Oil Field, which was subdivided from a 3-acre tract; a well having been drilled on the other 1½ acres of the 3-acre tract; and this court and the Supreme Cour.t held that the court abused its discretion in not granting the temporary injunction, because a voluntary subdivision of a tract of land will not entitle the owner of a subdivided…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Federal Radio Comm'n v. Nelson Brothers Bond & Mortgage Co. (Station WIBO)Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Ohio Valley Water Co. v. Ben Avon BoroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Trapp v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Texas Liquor Control Board v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Isbell v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API