Legal Opinion

Blair v. Riley, Exr.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHornbeck, J.

These proceedings in error are prosecuted by the plaintiff in error E. H. Blair, and by defendants in error Fairall and Haas, from judgments of the common pleas court. A jury was waived and the causes submitted to the trial judge. We refer to the parties as- they appeared below.

The plaintiffs were holders of safety deposit boxes in the People’s Bank of Frazeysburg, Ohio, of which institution J. L. Browning was, at the time the causes of action arose, and for many years prior thereto, cashier. The parties, without exception, base their causes of action upon contract. The proof, in the main,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Safe Deposit Co. v. SteadIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Morgan v. . BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Morgan v. Citizens BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. National Liberty Insurance Co. of America v. Sturtevant-Jones Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Cleveland-Akron Bus Co. v. RogoffOhio Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  2. Kramer v. Grand National Bank of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  3. Buell v. BrunnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Hurt v. Bank One, Dayton, NaOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API