Byrd v. Reichert
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
The respondent, Pleasant Byrd, obtained a peremptory writ of mandate, commanding the appellant, as register of the state land-office, to prepare, have signed, and issue to him, respondent, a patent for 960 acres of swamp and overflowed land in Tulare County, described as section 1 and the east half of section 2 in township 21 south, range 21 east, Mount Diablo meridian.
The facts involved in this controversy are as follows: The respondent made application to purchase the above-described section and a half of land, and on the eighth day of April, 1873, received from the register…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Laugenour v. ShanklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Cunningham v. ShanklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Danielwitz v. TempleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by3 opinions
- Youle v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Wrinkle v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Kleinsorge v. BurgbacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907