Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tourscher

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 23, 1996No. 359PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

Herein, among the issues with which we are presented is the unusual question of whether the prosecution may strike prospective jurors solely on the basis of gender in an effort to insure a fair and impartial jury for the defendant. After careful review, we conclude that appellant’s constitutional rights under J.E.B. v. Alabama, 511 U.S. 127, 114 S.Ct. 1419, 128 L.Ed.2d 89 (1994), were violated, despite the prosecution’s apparently noble reasoning behind the use of its peremptory challenges. Accordingly, we find that appellant is entitled to a new trial.

On appeal from the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mark D. Tourscher v. Martin Horn, Secretary of the Pa. Dept. Of Corrections John McCullough Superintendent ,(d.c. Civil No. 98-Cv-00176j)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. GarrettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Com. v. Browndorf, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Com. v. Thoman, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. Tourscher v. McCulloughCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API