Legal Opinion
Sandee Manufacturing Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 20, 1959No. 55 C 1974PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff is an Illinois corporation engaged in the extrusion of plastic materials which it sells in interstate commerce. Defendant is a Delaware corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of various chemical products, including methyl methacrylate monomer from which it produces cast sheet and molding powder.
The complaint states that the action is based on Sections 1, 2, 7, and 8 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2, 15 note, 7, and Sections 1, 4, 12, and 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 12, 15, 22, 26. Plaintiff seeks treble damages under Section 4 of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Hoskins Coal & Dock Corp. v. Truax Traer Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Schiffman Bros, Inc. v. Texas CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Caldwell-Clements, Inc. v. McGraw-Hill Pub. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Baush MacHine Tool Co. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. NYSCO Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- Luey v. Sterling Drug, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1965