Legal Opinion

Smythe v. Waffle House

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 2007No. COA06-703PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

Employer Waffle House and its insurer Osteen Adjusting Services, Inc. ("defendants") appeal from an Industrial Commission ("Commission") opinion on remand vacating a previously approved settlement agreement, contending that the Commission did not have the authority to reinstate total disability benefits for employee Mona Lisa Smythe ("plaintiff"). After careful review, we affirm the Commission's opinion on remand.

This case has come before the Court of Appeals before. Smythe v. Waffle House [Smythe I], 170 N.C.App. 361, 612 S.E.2d 345 (2005). That opinion sets out the facts and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hawley v. Wayne Dale ConstructionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Foster v. Carolina Marble and Tile Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Smythe v. Waffle HouseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kyle v. Holston GroupCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API