Legal Opinion

Stone v. Ransel Trading Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSidney A. Fine, J.

On this motion to dismiss the complaint, a stipulation is presented that the oral agreements, upon which both causes of action are based, were not evidenced by a written memorandum signed by defendant or its lawful agent.

The first cause of action is predicated, in part, upon an alleged oral agreement by defendant to pay plaintiff a specified commission, if he obtained the ‘ ‘ Struhl ’ ’ account for defendant, “on all business, done by defendant with ‘Struhl’.” This agreement, by its terms, was not to be performed within one year from the making thereof, because “ Struhl ” might place orders…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Bartgis Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  2. Cohen v. Bartgis Brothers CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. Martocci v. Greater New York Brewery, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Nat Nal Service Stations, Inc. v. WolfNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Rathbone v. MionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jack N. Entis, D/B/A Entis Associates, and Jack N. Entis, Individually v. Atlantic Wire & Cable CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  2. Urvant v. IMCO Poultry, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1970
  3. Jack N. Entis, D/B/A Entis Associates, and Jack N. Entis, Individually v. Atlantic Wire & Cable CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API