Legal Opinion

LePatner & Associates, LLP v. Horowitz

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Marilyn Shafer, J.

Defendants Harvey Horowitz and Bernard Horowitz (the Horowitz brothers) move to vacate a default judgment on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction, pursuant to CPLR 5015 *188(a) (4) and 305 (b), and to dismiss this action, or, in the alternative, for leave to serve an answer.

Plaintiff LePatner & Associates, LLP (LePatner LLP), a law firm, commenced this action on April 7, 2008, by filing a summons and complaint. In the complaint, LePatner LLP seeks to recover the sum of $187,107.61, together with interest, in unpaid legal fees and disbursements…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frankel v. SchillingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Muslusky v. . Lehigh Valley Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. In re de SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Brownell v. FeingoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. European American Bank v. LegumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API