LePatner & Associates, LLP v. Horowitz
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Marilyn Shafer, J.
Defendants Harvey Horowitz and Bernard Horowitz (the Horowitz brothers) move to vacate a default judgment on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction, pursuant to CPLR 5015 *188(a) (4) and 305 (b), and to dismiss this action, or, in the alternative, for leave to serve an answer.
Plaintiff LePatner & Associates, LLP (LePatner LLP), a law firm, commenced this action on April 7, 2008, by filing a summons and complaint. In the complaint, LePatner LLP seeks to recover the sum of $187,107.61, together with interest, in unpaid legal fees and disbursements…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frankel v. SchillingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Muslusky v. . Lehigh Valley Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- In re de SanchezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Brownell v. FeingoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- European American Bank v. LegumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.