Legal Opinion

Hart Surgical, Inc. v. Ultracision, Inc.

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided April 25, 2000No. C.A. 97-594-TPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TORRES, Chief Judge.

UltraCision, Inc. and Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. (“UltraCision”) brought this action pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (the “FAA”), 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., and the Rhode Island Arbitration Act (the “RIAA”), R.I.G.L. § 10-3-1 et seq., which they have styled as a Motion to Vacate Portions of Arbitration Award. The “award” in question found UltraCision liable for wrongfully terminating a contract between UltraCision and Hart Surgical, Inc. (“Hart”).

On September 27, 1999, this Court issued an Order for UltraCision to show cause why its motion to vacate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Republic Natural Gas Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Diapulse Corporation of America v. Carba, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Trade & Transport, Inc. v. Natural Petroleum Charterers IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. Picciano v. PetriccaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. Metallgesellschaft A.G. v. M/v Capitan Constante and Yacimientos Petroliferos FiscalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hart Surgical, Inc. v. Ultracision, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API