Hart Surgical, Inc. v. Ultracision, Inc.
District Court, D. Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TORRES, Chief Judge.
UltraCision, Inc. and Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. (“UltraCision”) brought this action pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (the “FAA”), 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., and the Rhode Island Arbitration Act (the “RIAA”), R.I.G.L. § 10-3-1 et seq., which they have styled as a Motion to Vacate Portions of Arbitration Award. The “award” in question found UltraCision liable for wrongfully terminating a contract between UltraCision and Hart Surgical, Inc. (“Hart”).
On September 27, 1999, this Court issued an Order for UltraCision to show cause why its motion to vacate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Republic Natural Gas Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Diapulse Corporation of America v. Carba, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Trade & Transport, Inc. v. Natural Petroleum Charterers IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Picciano v. PetriccaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Metallgesellschaft A.G. v. M/v Capitan Constante and Yacimientos Petroliferos FiscalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hart Surgical, Inc. v. Ultracision, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001