Legal Opinion

Klochinski v. Shores Lumber Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1896PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Ashland county: Jomsr K. Paeish, Circuit Judge. This was an action to recover damages sustained by the-plaintiff by reason of the alleged negligence of the defendant while in its employ as a laborer in its steam sawmill..

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Ashland county: Jomsr K. Paeish, Circuit Judge. This was an action to recover damages sustained by the-plaintiff by reason of the alleged negligence of the defendant while in its employ as a laborer in its steam sawmill.. The mill is a double mill, and the logs are brought into it over live rollers by a chain with brads which pierce the logs and haul them up on a log deck, on each side of which the carriages run upon which the logs are placed and carried forward to the saw. The carriage and saw on each side, forming a double mill, are supplied…

1Opinion of the CourtPinitet, J.

1. The special verdict is so defective that it ■does not warrant or support the judgment. The special ■question above quoted is certainly unique, but, with its answer, is wholly inadequate to show that actionable negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury. After a manifestly strenuous effort at certainty of statement and clearness of definition, it still fails to comply with the well-settled rule requiring questions to be submitted to be single, direct, and plain questions. Carroll v. Bohan, 43 Wis. 218, 221. A verdict must be cer*424tain, at least to a common…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carroll v. BohanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Dwyer v. American Express Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Hartford v. Northern Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Kliegel v. Weisel & Vilter Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Stutz v. ArmourWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Baxter v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Mauch v. City of HartfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Deisenrieter v. Kraus-Merkel Malting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Patnode v. WestenhaverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Sladky v. Marinette Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API