Rinehart v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
The petition for writ of certiorari herein reflected apparent jurisdiction in this court, hence we issued the writ and have now heard the argument of the respective parties.
The facts as limned by the Second District Court of Appeal’s opinion1 show that the petitioner voluntarily consented in writing to the search of his automobile. Thus it becomes unnecessary, if not impossible, for us to consider and decide whether the search was made pursuant to a lawful arrest. Finally the opinion of the District Court of Appeal does not on its face disclose the circumstances attendant upon the search of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rinehart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Shay v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Echols v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
- Canney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- William O. Sutherland v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.