Legal Opinion

Soumpholphakdy v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 13, 1989No. 1-89-0009PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE FREEMAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs, Champa Soumpholphakdy, Kesone Soumpholphakdy, and Khaikeo Soumpholphakdy, appeal from an order of the trial court which granted a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendant, Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance (Prudential), and denied plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment in a declaratory judgment action regarding an automobile liability insurance policy. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court.

Plaintiffs’ complaint for declaratory judgment sought a determination of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Weedhopper of Utah, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. Schoenknecht v. Prairie State Farmers InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  3. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. Virginia DifferdingIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. GormanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Berry v. GibsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kim v. Mercedes-Benz, U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. American Freedom Insurance v. UriosteguiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. American Freedom Insurance Co. v. UriosteguiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. Kim v. Mercedes-Benz, U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API