Soumpholphakdy v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE FREEMAN
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiffs, Champa Soumpholphakdy, Kesone Soumpholphakdy, and Khaikeo Soumpholphakdy, appeal from an order of the trial court which granted a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendant, Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance (Prudential), and denied plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment in a declaratory judgment action regarding an automobile liability insurance policy. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court.
Plaintiffs’ complaint for declaratory judgment sought a determination of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kramer v. Weedhopper of Utah, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Schoenknecht v. Prairie State Farmers InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
- State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. Virginia DifferdingIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. GormanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Berry v. GibsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kim v. Mercedes-Benz, U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- American Freedom Insurance v. UriosteguiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- American Freedom Insurance Co. v. UriosteguiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Kim v. Mercedes-Benz, U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004