Legal Opinion

Whalen v. Webster

California Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1911No. Sac. No. 1728PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is a proceeding under section 1664 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to determine the succession to the estate of George Roach, deceased.

The plaintiff, Margaret Copsey, now deceased, was the surviving widow of George Roach. He died testate and his will was duly probated. His estate consisted entirely of community property. The right to succeed to said estate depends upon the effect of the following clauses of his will:—

“Thirdly: I give and bequeath to my wife, Margaret Roach, all and singular my property, real and personal, wherever situated, and all moneys belonging to me of which I may…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BoodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. In re the Estate of GilmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Jewell v. JewellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Whalen v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. In Re the Estate of HormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Sanfilippo v. LesserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Whalen v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API