Legal Opinion

Holler Rental Co. v. Marsh

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 10, 1986No. 85-644PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORFINGER, Judge.

The issue raised on this appeal is the correctness of the trial court’s order holding that the insurer for the lessor of a vehicle was responsible for primary coverage on that vehicle to the full extent of its coverage. The vehicle in question was involved in an accident while being operated by the lessee’s employee.

When the leased vehicle was brought back for repairs, the lessor supplied a substitute vehicle and the parties entered into a separate, written agreement covering the substitute vehicle. While driving the substitute vehicle the lessee’s employee was involved in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allstate Ins. Co. v. FowlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. METROPOLITAN PROPERTY v. Chicago Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Maryland Cas. Co. v. Reliance Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Value Rent-A-CarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Quinlan Rental & Leasing, Inc. v. LinnelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Snider v. Continental Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Gray v. Major Rent-A-Car, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API