Legal Opinion · Dissent

City & County of Denver v. Industrial Commission

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1985No. 84CA0930Published

1DissentBerman, Judge

I disagree with the majority’s ruling that the payments made to claimant during the year after her accident were “disability benefits,” and therefore, I dissent.

I do not agree with the majority’s conclusion that the issue of whether the payments made to the claimant were “wages” or “disability benefits” is a question of law. Here, there was conflicting evidence as to whether the payments were wages or disability benefits. Thus, the issue was one of fact. See Rahder v. Industrial Commission, 105 Colo. 594, 100 P.2d 1043 (1940).

The referee made a factual determination based on the evidence that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission of Colorado v. SirokmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. Karamanian v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Olsgard v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  4. Rahder v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API