Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 24, 1918No. 5005PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of McLennan. Tried below before the! Hon. Richard I. Munroe. ‘ Appeal from a conviction of theft; penalty, five years imprisonment in the penitentiary. | The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Judge.

Appellant was charged by indictment with theft and in the same indictment, by separate count, with fraudulently receiving stolen property.

The facts are sufficient to lead to the conclusion that one Oscar Kim-ball and the appellant acting togethér stole an automobile, the property of Templeton. The theft charged was based upon these facts and the i receiving stolen property is alleged to have been from Oscar Kimball, the same person who acted with appellant in the theft. Each of the counts were embraced in the charge; the verdict received is as follows: “We, the jury, find the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HaskinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. Wheeler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  3. Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
  4. Street v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  5. Yate's Mercantile Co. v. Farmers' Guaranty State Bank of JacksonvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dennis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Bargesser v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  3. Byrd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Wooten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Snider v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API