Legal Opinion

Fama v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joan B. Lefkowitz, J.

Plaintiffs are judgment creditors of defendant’s insured. They *873sue the defendant pursuant to section 3420 (a) (2) of the Insurance Law upon an unsatisfied judgment and seek to recover the policy limits plus accrued interest on the entire judgment. Defendant, in its answer, pleads affirmative defenses of tender and, alternatively, that its obligation for payment of interest, if any, is limited to the interest applicable to the policy limits and not any judgment in excess thereof.

On November 7, 1988 defendant’s insured, Michael Marchetti, Jr., was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Pavia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Kortright v. . CadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  4. Halpin v. . Phenix Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. New York State Department of InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API